What does it mean to be a Buddhist nun in Ladakh?
By Vibha Arora
Gender is a significant faultline in Buddhist societies as in Hindu
or Islamic one’s, yet there is a lacuna of studies following a
gender perspective. This is succinctly encapsulated by the Zanskari
local idiom such as ‘women are seven lifetimes behind men’
and ‘no Buddhist in her right mind desires a female body’.
It gives me pleasure to report and review Kim Gutschow’s seminal
study “Being a Buddhist Nun: The struggle for enlightenment in
the Himalayas” which was awarded the prestigious 2005 American
Ethnological Society’s Sharon Stephens Book Prize (See http://www.music.columbia.edu/~cecenter/AES/awards2005.html).
The Buddhist monks and nuns comprise about 2 per cent of the total population
of Zanskar. All the nine nunneries of Zanskar are practitioners’
of the Gelugpa sect that maintains the highest standards of celibacy
and asceticism in Mahayana Buddhism. Gutschow’s study is path
breaking in highlighting the gender inequalities that deny status, independence,
and perpetually subordinate and marginalize the Buddhist nuns. Buddhist
women can never become monks or be ordained due to the ideology of purity
and pollution: “the fire of asceticism may burn off temporary
pollution, but it cannot erase the permanent stigmata of female impurity”.
The monograph offering a nun’s eye view of Buddhism concludes
by documenting the reforms demanded by the Buddhist nuns, their struggle
to get patronage for their nunneries and to make themselves independent.
It draws upon Kim’s extended fieldwork in the physically challenging
conditions of Zanskar and Ladakh in India between 1991 and 2001 (thirty-nine
months). She explains how Buddhist monastic practices reinstate the
social hierarchies that the Buddha had disdained: “nuns remain
subject to the authority and surveillance of monks throughout a religious
life that is supposedly dedicated to transcending gender and other social
hierarchies”. On the one hand, women are regarded to be dangerous
on account of their potent sexuality and fertility as menstruating and
childbearing bodies, while on the other hand they are the symbolic vessel
of the group’s honor and constantly in danger of being defiled
by sexual desire.
In Zanskar, the lay and monastic realms are not discontinuous as indeed
Buddhist monasticism is structured around a gendered division of labour
and the dualities of sex as the lay communities are. Zanskari nuns are
distinguished from female renuciates who live at home and do not perform
any public rituals. For comprehending lay patronage, which sustains
Buddhist monasticism she uses politico-economic ideas such as ‘the
Buddhist economy of merit’, ‘Buddhist monastery as a wealthy
corporation (biggest landowners and functions as a treasury and venture
capital firm)’ and ‘the traffic in women’. These enable
her to highlight the regulated and continuous exchange between the laity
and the monastery, and the politico-economic and the religious functionaries
of Zanskar.
Kim forcefully argues in her monograph that the community of Buddhist
nuns comprises an alternative society and not an anti-thesis of society.
Families exchange women with the nunneries in order to earn merit and
simultaneously ensure the promise of their productive services. As a
nun, a girl may have access to ritual knowledge, peers, and pilgrimages
which take her beyond the boundaries of the village and the provincial
monasteries yet she is tied indissolubly to her natal families and village
in her role as a productive labourer on the family farms and monastic
estates. Thus the Buddhist nuns play a critical mediating role between
the monastery and the laity by performing ritual services and serving
monks and the society while earning merit for their families and the
community while performing productive labour in the fields. The traffic
of women between the household and the monasteries and the sacred and
the secular realms is clearly evident with these nuns “trapped
within the traffic in women as the average bride.
The power and status of Buddhist monasticism and the subordination and
subjection of nuns is critically revealed by the politico-economic factors
that underlie village religious practices and the monastic organization.
Gutschow argues that the core of village religion centers on purification,
the appeasement of worldly spirits and worship of compassionate otherworldly
Buddhist deities. Nuns and monks take vows to abstain from worldly pursuits
but nuns end up working as domestic servants. The Buddhist economy of
merit cannot assure the nuns of a livelihood or provide funds for their
periodic rituals. Nuns earn generalized merit for the entire community
and not pragmatic rituals that would assure them patronage. In contrast
Buddhist monks perform a wide range of rituals of a soteriological,
instrumental and propitiatory nature to ensure the fertility, prosperity
and health of the individual and the community while engaging in tantric
meditations, which confer status and power assured funding for periodic
rituals and the monastery. The contrast between the Buddhist monasteries
that function and exist as corporations with its rich endowments in
land, wealth, and treasures stands in shocking contrast with the impoverishment
of the nuns and penury of their nunneries: the nuns often do not even
get two square meals a day. Often these nuns are forced to earn their
livelihood as domestic servants and farm labourers. They hold servile
and peripheral position such that even the most spiritually accomplished
nun stands below a male novitiate. Ultimately all nuns are subject to
the spiritual authority of monks.
The position of Buddhist nuns in Zanskar is comparable with the householder
lamas among Nyingma Buddhists of Sikkim among whom I conducted my doctoral
research. These householder lamas perform both ritual services and productive
labour on family farms in order to sustain themselves, as their monasteries
cannot financially support them. Yet unlike the Buddhist nuns of Zanskar,
the householder lamas of Sikkim marry, beget children, inherit property,
engage in trade, and enjoy considerable status and power in their families
and the community. Ascetic monks have higher status and spiritual authority
as compared to any householder lama in Sikkim, yet gender hierarchies
persist as celibate nuns in Sikkim are ranked below any ordained householder
lama.
The narratives of the Buddhist nuns outline a comprehensive picture
of what motivates a woman to dedicate herself to a spiritual life in
the nunnery thereby rejecting her feminity and maternity in becoming
a nun. With the help of several case studies, Gutschow explains the
rite de passage that transforms a girl into a nun and the central role-played
by these nuns in the Buddhist economy of merit (exchanges between the
monastery and laity). Significantly, the narratives of these Buddhist
nuns highlight their skilful subversion of the hierarchies that oppress
them and document their agency.
This seminal work breaks the silence on gender in Buddhist studies and
Himalayan anthropology that has yielded numerous studies of Buddhist
monasteries and (male) monasticism while completely ignoring the nuns
and their nunneries. I hope this book will encourage other ethnographic
studies to follow a gender perspective.